Aug 202010
 

I’m skipping my Friday writing post. Why? Cause I’ve got something far more amusing to share.

So it’s late night. 2:30 am here. I should be in bed. When I wake up in the morning, things might not be as funny. But for now, I’ve laughed so hard, there are tears in my eyes. And I’ve yet to finish. Finish what you ask? Watching episodes of Zoe Who! That’s what.

Why do I find this so amusing? One moment. Let me pull out my spreadsheet of queries, rejections, and rejections, and rejections, and…

Moving on. :) Zoe Who dispels many of the scare tactics which discourage authors from self-publishing. Now I’m not saying self-publishing is for everyone. And I’m also not saying every book that doesn’t land an agent/editor is worthy of self-publishing. So what am I saying? :)

I’m saying self-publishing isn’t a dirty word. I’m not even sure why people are so down on self-publishing anyway. I’m trying to figure out whom self-publishing threatens for those in the traditional trade to bash it so hard.

If you’ve followed my reviews, you know I haven’t enjoyed every book I’ve read. In fact, the list of books I have not finished is growing quite high. I don’t even bother reviewing those. For the record, my did not finish pile is all books published by traditional means. As they (whoever “they” are) say, taste is subjective. Shouldn’t that subjectivity travel into the indie realm also?

Anyway, there are some great books out there which are self-published…well at least one which I’ve read. Comfort Food by Kitty Thomas (review here), which is the only Indie book I’ve taken the time to read. And if there is one, I’m sure there are more. Readers just have to keep an eye out for recommendations. Cause really, there’s no slush pile to wade through. Self-published books typically get advertisement through word of mouth. Otherwise, they go unnoticed. Out of sight, out of mind. At least they’ve been out of my mind until I received the Comfort Food Recommendation.

So, now for a bit of Zoe Winter free advertising, cause I liked Zoe Who so much! Here’s the thing. I’ve not read any of Zoe Winter’s books, so I can’t in good faith recommend her. However, you don’t need my recommendation to take a chance on Ms. Winters. Head to her blog for a free download of Kept, the first book of her series Blood Lust. It’s a short read, only 75ish pages. See if you like this Indie author’s novella and go from there.

May 142010
 

When I started writing, I’d never heard of a critique group or partner. I just wrote. I wasn’t sure if my writing was decent or not. It bothered me. My husband was not a big reader, and having my young daughters (both avid readers) read the erotic romances I wrote just didn’t seem all too appealing. I did a bit of research and found the concept of critters. After some time, I finally joined a critique group.

My original purpose of joining a critique group was to receive help with my writing. I wanted to know if my writing was rockin’ or not. I thought critiquing the work of others was just a chore I’d have to do in order to reap the benefits of having others review my work. The help I’ve received from critters reviewing my work has been awesome! As a new writer, they pointed out issues which never even crossed my mind. However, there are so many other benefits to critiquing than just receiving a critique.

One advice I’ve found time and time again is to read, read, read the genre you write. It gives you an opportunity to see different styles of writing. Same thing with critiquing. Reading another individual’s work gives you as an author the opportunity to see what works and what doesn’t. As you point out awkward issues in another person’s writing, you might also find similarities in your own work. If nothing else, it might help you avoid making those same mistakes while drafting.

Don’t just stop at giving and receiving critiques. Take time to check out the critiques of others. Use it as a learning experience. After I critique a work, I find it particularly helpful to read other critiques on the same piece of work. Sometimes critters point out issues I overlooked or didn’t realize was problematic because of my lack of experience.

My encounters with other critters has been invaluable in my ongoing commitment to learn the trade. If you don’t have a critique partner or group, I highly suggest finding one. Friends and family are great for building up the ego (usually), but they may not have the qualifications or gumption to offer a real assessment of your work.

Keep in mind, critiquing is subjective. Critters come with various knowledge bases, experiences, and tastes–just like readers. Keep or trash whatever works while taking advantage of the diversity.

A couple of critique groups I’ve used and enjoyed are RWCcritique and Scribophile. Please feel free to comment on critique groups you’ve used and value.

Apr 162010
 

Katiebabs posted a blog yesterday about Respect and Professionalism from the Agent to the Writer and Visa-Versa. It’s a wonderful post, and I hope you take a look. It hit me on such a personal level that I wanted to follow up with my own response. I’m seeking representation, new to the industry with no connections, and honestly afraid I’ll say something to blacklist myself before I even get started. There! I said it. :) I’m afraid. Moving on.

Katiebabs mentioned many agents  are helpful in the query process. She names a few in her blog post. In addition to her list, I read the Query Shark aka Janet Reid. She’s harsh and no nonsense, but her critiques push the author forward, and she gives authors additional tries until they get the query right. She goes above and beyond for authors she doesn’t even represent. I can’t expect her services from every agent, but knowing agents are there who care for the aspiring author is encouraging.

I’ve been on twitter a few months and have seen the other side of agents–ones who mock writers on a regular basis and post negative blogs. Agents have no shortage of authors from whom to choose. I understand. With agents receiving hundreds of query letters a week, I guess there’s no worry about burning bridges. For authors, it’s another story. Thousands upon thousands of authors vie for the attention of a few hundred agents. I’m okay with that. It reminds me of applying for a job. Only thing, it’s not applying for a job. It’s more on the lines of seeking a professional to take one on as a client. Having an agent increases the chances of an author seeing his/her work published. An author doesn’t NEED an agent for this to happen, but it certainly helps. I think of agents as gatekeepers. Get your work past the secret agent door, and they’ll push it through to a publisher…hopefully. :)

Here is where my frustration comes into play. Before I started querying, I imagined it would be like hiring a lawyer. I’d shop for the perfect fit, and the lawyer would choose to represent me or not. I thought we (the agent and author) were on equal footing, seeking each other in order to meet a common goal. Instead I feel as if many agents look at authors as a nuisance they have to tolerate until they decide to take one on as a client. Authors are not beneath agents. It’s supposed to be a partnership. The author has the novel. The agent has the contacts. Without both the novel and the contact, no contract would exist. Everyone loses.

Someone might say, but you don’t understand the horrible stuff which passes an agent’s desk. Perhaps people think if I saw the crap, I’d be more sympathetic to the agent’s dilemma. I critique. I know a lot of work isn’t up to par. Heck, I’ve received rejections myself…I’m sure agents have put my work in the ‘not up to par’ category.

Here is my thought. Regardless of how frustrating the situation is rude, disrespectful, or unprofessional behavior is unwarranted. An agent who has no clients has nothing to sell. To me, this makes authors valuable.

I’ve heard agents say they don’t get paid to read query letters; they get paid for sells.  Many agents read on their personal time. I can imagine it can be time consuming, but isn’t that part of the process of finding clients? Writers don’t get paid to write query letters and synopses; they get paid for getting their work published. Likewise, query letters and synopses are part of the writer process for finding a good literary agent and publisher. Agents and writers both have tasks they’d prefer not to do. Like my husband says, sometimes we do chores we hate because we like the end results. His take on yard work, but it applies to the query process on both sides of the fence.

Agents don’t have to read my query letters, and they don’t have to respond. Of course I’d like them to, but it’s really they’re prerogative. Still, without those query letters from authors, the selection would be very sparse, leaving an agent with few or even no one new to represent. Those mounds of query letters might house an introduction to your next client aka your next pay check. Don’t future clients deserve a bit of respect and professionalism? Be one of those agents writers are dying to have because they’ve heard and seen such amazing things from and about you.

When I land the perfect agent, and people ask who represents me, I want to be able to puff out my chest. I don’t want to mumble your name under my breath because I’ve read the snide remarks you’ve made about other authors. It frustrates me and leaves me a little resentful to think agents have become such a commodity that some think they can treating aspiring authors like crap.

Nathan Bransford wrote a blog this week How Would You Handle the Query Deluge? He’s said in the past he loves queries and said it again here. He probably receives more queries than any agent out there. Yet he keeps a 24 hour response time to queries, with a few exceptions. Why? Here’s a direct quote pulled from Nathan’s comment.

“Oh – also meant to mention regarding delaying responses to people I might be interested: I’ve had times where I was out of the office and couldn’t get back to people for a couple of days, and by the time I was back they were already signed. Hopefully that also helps explain why I jump on things quickly – I send requests for partials just as fast as I send passes.”

He’s looking for the next great book and knows they’re written by authors (potential clients). He’s professional, helpful, and respectful. As an author he DOES NOT represent (though I’d love if he did :)), I feel valued. He’s combing the slush piles for me or maybe you. He doesn’t resent us for querying, even though I’m sure he receives the worst of the worst sometimes. He doesn’t make himself to be better than the writer. He treats us (writers) as equals who might one day be his partner in the publishing industry.

I’ve seen agents post their feelings were hurt by a writer. I’ve seen agents rally around the injured party. I completely sympathize with the mean responses agents receive after sending a rejection. It’s hard enough trying to do a job without having people rag on you. Agents can’t represent everyone. At the same time, I ask agents to remember that writers have feelings also. You get hurt by unsavory responses, and so do we.

A lot of authors put their heart into their work. Writing is a dream for some. They’ve taken that dream and presented it to you as an agent. Yet some agents find it acceptable to take someone’s dream and jeer. Suppose the situation were reverse and agents were plentiful and authors were few. How would you feel if authors posted your attempts at trying to acquire their works then laughed?

Anyway, I hope some time in the future we (authors and agents) can overcome who needs whom more and just become partners like we’re supposed to be.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Easy AdSense by Unreal